B在购买回热装置之前,先做一个快速的 投资回收期计算 即可判断是否划算。只需要几个现场数据和当地能源价格。
The Core Formula
年节能量 (kWh) = 1.2 × 风量 (m³/h) × η × dT (℃) × 小时/年 ÷ 1000
其中1.2为空气近似体积热容 (Wh/m³·K),eta为效率,dT为排风与送风之间的温差。
Worked Example
- 风量:10,000 m³/h
- 效率:75 % (0.75)
- dT(冬季平均):20 ℃
- 运行小时数:6,000 / 年
- 能源价格:$0.12 / kWh
节能量 = 1.2 × 10,000 × 0.75 × 20 × 6,000 ÷ 1000 = 1,080,000 Wh = 1,080 kWh/年.
价值 = 1,080 × $0.12 = 129.6美元/年.
若装置(含安装)费用为$1,500,则投资回收期约为 11.6年 – but add fan-energy savings and incentives, and real projects in cold climates often land at 2-4 years.
Factors That Shorten Payback
- 更高的dT(更冷的气候、更热的排风)
- 更长的运行时间(连续工艺)
- 更高的能源价格
- 返利或碳信用
- 供暖+制冷的复合节约(焓)
Turn the estimate into a decision with a short sensitivity check. Vary the two strongest drivers, the temperature difference and the operating hours, to see how fragile the payback is; a project that only works at the best guess is risky. Add the fan-energy penalty and any cooling saving from enthalpy recovery, since ignoring either skews the result. Then layer in incentives, carbon pricing, or an energy-service contract, which can move a marginal case to clearly worthwhile. Treat the formula as a screening tool and confirm with the manufacturer curve and, for larger spends, a detailed model. Our 热回收解决方案 include performance data to support that check.
常见问题
是否应包含风机能耗?
Yes – subtract the extra fan electricity from the saved heating value for a true net payback.
这个精度足以作为采购依据吗?
It is a good screening estimate; confirm with the manufacturer’s performance curve and a detailed energy model before purchase.
常见问题
是否应包含风机能耗?
是的 — 从节约的供暖价值中扣除风机额外耗电,才能得到真实的净回收期。
这个精度足以作为采购依据吗?
这是一个很好的初步估算;采购前请用厂家性能曲线和详细能耗模型加以确认。
相关产品
面向暖通空调与通风的板式、旋转式或热管回收。
空气与液体用大表面积固定芯体。
大风量用高效能量回收。
用于洁净场合的被动、完全分离气流。