Plaque vs Rotatif vs Tube à chaleur : comment choisir un échangeur de chaleur

Choosing the right air-to-air heat exchanger depends on airflow, temperature, humidity, installation space, and contamination risk. This guide compares the three most common technologies.

Quick Comparison

Feature Plate Exchanger Rotary Wheel Caloduc
Efficacité High (70–85 %) High (75–85 %) Moderate (50–70 %)
Pièces mobiles Aucun Motor/bearings Aucun
Cross-contamination Very low Low with purge Zero
Moisture transfer Sensible only* Yes (enthalpy) No
Maintenance Low Modéré Very low
Distance flexibility Limited Limited Élevé

*Special enthalpy plates can transfer limited moisture.

Choose Plate When…

  • You need high sensible efficiency with low maintenance.
  • The air streams are close together.
  • Cross-contamination must be minimized.
  • The application is drying, data center cooling, or general ventilation.

Choose Rotary Wheel When…

  • You need both heat and humidity recovery.
  • Airflow is large and centralized.
  • Installation space allows a round wheel housing.

Choose Heat Pipe When…

  • The supply and exhaust ducts are separated.
  • Zero cross-contamination is required.
  • The environment is dusty, corrosive, or explosive.

Selection by Application

  • Mine ventilation: Heat pipe or plate
  • Data centers: Plate (sensible, no moisture transfer)
  • Swimming pools / ice rinks: Roue rotative d'enthalpie
  • Industrial drying: Plate (sensible, no moisture return)
  • Kitchen / lab exhaust: Run-around coil or heat pipe

Questions fréquemment posées

Which technology is most reliable?
All three are reliable when correctly applied. Plate exchangers generally have the lowest maintenance and longest life.

Can I combine technologies?
Yes. For example, a plate exchanger can be used for primary recovery and a heat pipe for a remote exhaust point.

Selection Workflow

  1. Fix the duty point: supply and exhaust airflow, temperature difference, and allowed pressure drop.
  2. Decide sensible vs enthalpy from climate and moisture load.
  3. Score contamination risk – dusty, greasy or hazardous exhaust points to plate or heat pipe.
  4. Check geometry: close ducts favor plate or wheel; separated ducts favor heat pipe or run-around coil.
  5. Confirm footprint, maintenance access and budget.

Common Pitfalls

  • Specifying a rotary wheel where winter humidity must stay low – use sensible plate instead.
  • Forgetting purge sector and seals on wheels, which control cross-leakage.
  • Undersizing plate spacing in greasy air, which clogs fast.

Questions fréquemment posées

Which technology is most reliable?

All three are reliable when correctly applied. Plate exchangers generally have the lowest maintenance and longest life.

Can I combine technologies?

Yes. For example, a plate exchanger can be used for primary recovery and a heat pipe for a remote exhaust point.

Spécifiez le bon échangeur

Nos ingénieurs dimensionnent le noyau selon votre débit, température et budget de perte de charge, et choisissent la récupération par plaque, rotative ou caloduc selon l'application. Lisez le guide de l'échangeur , ou contactez-nous pour une spécification.

Demander un devis

Produits connexes

Air-to-Air Heat Exchanger

Récupération par plaque, rotative ou caloduc pour le CVC et la ventilation.

Plate Heat Exchanger

Noyaux stationnaires à grande surface pour l'air et le liquide.

roue de récupération rotative

Récupération d'énergie à haute efficacité pour grands débits.

Heat Pipe Heat Exchanger

Courants passifs et totalement séparés pour applications propres.

Articles similaires

Commencez à saisir votre recherche ci-dessus et pressez Entrée pour rechercher. ESC pour annuler.

Retour en haut
Calculateurs gratuits de récupération de chaleur et outils de dimensionnement